E-ISSN 2636-834X
 

Technical Note
Online Published: 31 Dec 2012
 


Interpretation of correlation analysis results

Selim Kılıç.


Abstract
Correlation analysis is used to quantify the degree of linear association between two variables. Correlation coefficient is showed as “r” and it may have values between (-) 1 and (+)1. The symbols (-) or (+) in front of “r coefficient” show the direction of correlation. The direction of association does not affect the strength of association. A “ r coefficient” which is equal or greater than 0.70 is accepted as a good association. Correlation coeefficient only remarks the strength of association. Finding a good correlation coefficient between two variables does not explain a causal relationship between these two variables. Statistical significance is much affected from sample size in also correlation analysis. Square of corrrelation coefficient is described as coefficient of determination. Correlation coefficient is also much affected from outliers as standard deviation does. The proper test selection may vary depend on the type of variable and their distribution characteristics (ordinal, continuous, normally distributed or not). Pearson, Spearman and Kendall’s tau-B tests are the most common used tests. Partial correlation provides the explanation of the association between two variables when the third variable was controlled. When we interpret the correlation analysis results we firstly evaluate the strength of association and then indicate whether it is also statistically significant or not.

Key words: correlation, linear association, strength of association


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Selim Kılıç
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Selim Kılıc. [Interpretation of correlation analysis results]. PBS. 2012; 2(4): 191-193. Turkish. doi:10.5455/jmood.20121209012824


Web Style

Selim Kılıc. [Interpretation of correlation analysis results]. https://www.pbsciences.org/?mno=29685 [Access: September 13, 2024]. Turkish. doi:10.5455/jmood.20121209012824


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Selim Kılıc. [Interpretation of correlation analysis results]. PBS. 2012; 2(4): 191-193. Turkish. doi:10.5455/jmood.20121209012824



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Selim Kılıc. [Interpretation of correlation analysis results]. PBS. (2012), [cited September 13, 2024]; 2(4): 191-193. Turkish. doi:10.5455/jmood.20121209012824



Harvard Style

Selim Kılıc (2012) [Interpretation of correlation analysis results]. PBS, 2 (4), 191-193. Turkish. doi:10.5455/jmood.20121209012824



Turabian Style

Selim Kılıc. 2012. [Interpretation of correlation analysis results]. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (4), 191-193. Turkish. doi:10.5455/jmood.20121209012824



Chicago Style

Selim Kılıc. "[Interpretation of correlation analysis results]." Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2012), 191-193. Turkish. doi:10.5455/jmood.20121209012824



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Selim Kılıc. "[Interpretation of correlation analysis results]." Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences 2.4 (2012), 191-193. Print.Turkish. doi:10.5455/jmood.20121209012824



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Selim Kılıc (2012) [Interpretation of correlation analysis results]. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (4), 191-193. Turkish. doi:10.5455/jmood.20121209012824